While this may seem like a sizable difference, the 12600K costs less than half of the 13900K. The UHD 770 GPUs packed into Intel’s newest 13th-gen Raptor Lake processors feature slightly faster boost clocks while retaining the same 300MHz base frequency: The Core i5-13600K has a max graphics dynamic frequency of 1.5GHz, the Core i5-13700K 1.6GHz, and the Core i9-13900K the maximum of 1.65GHz.Įven then, the Core i9-13900K’s pack-leading boost frequency is only 22.2% better than the lowest-end UHD 770-equipped Core i5-12600K. That’s a small 7.5% jump in performance from the Core i5-12600K to the top-of-the-line Core i9-12900K, for a rough 177% increase in cost. While all three 12th-gen models have GPU base-clocks of 300MHz, the boost clocks of the i5-12600K, i7-12700K, and i9-12900K GPUs are 1.35 GHz, 1.4GHz, and 1.45 GHz, respectively. How big will this difference be? Rather miniscule.
In other words, integrated graphics performance will vary slightly between lower and higher-end models. Whereas all graphics-equipped 11th-gen CPUs, from the i5-11600K to the i9-11900K had GPUs with the same 350MHz base and 1.3GHz boost frequencies, Alder Lake’s GPUs vary slightly in frequency. UHD 770 differs a bit from the 11th generation’s UHD 750 graphics in that there is some variation in clock speeds between models. The latest Raptor Lake 13th-gen Intel processor likewise employ UHD 770 integrated graphics, so the Core i5-13600K, Core i7-13700K, and Core i9-13900K are equipped with the same GPU as their most recent predecessors. Meanwhile, Intel’s lower-end 12th-gen SKUs, the Core i3-12100 and Core i5-12400 surprisingly feature same UHD 730 graphics as the Core i5-11400.
INTEL UHD GRAPHICS 770 AUTOCAD SERIES
Intel only includes a functional GPU in non-F series CPUs, so of the Alder Lake models only the i5-12600K, i7-12700K, and i9-12900K feature UHD 770 graphics.
INTEL UHD GRAPHICS 770 AUTOCAD UPGRADE
This is an upgrade over Rocket Lake’s UHD 750 graphics, which we reviewed and benchmarked earlier this year. They make a good difference.With the release of Intel’s 12th generation of processors on November 4, 2021, consumers also gained access to Intel’s latest revision of integrated graphics, dubbed UHD 770. If you want to use the system you have now, go on youtube and watch the resolve optimization videos. I am editing video with both my 2070 rtx in my workstation, and iris XE processor in my notebook. I don't know what the minimum reasonable requirements are, but I'd suspect that a fairly fast discrete graphics card might be needed for that sort of work.
The impression I get from reading others' posts here is that for things like 4K video, "faster is better", but especially nowadays top speed GPUs cost serious money. I only do still photography, so I'm not knowledgeable about video of any kind, sorry. Should I wait and get a computer with a dedicated Graphics cards or would a UHD 730 or 750 be good enough. I don't do any gaming and will only edit short HD and 4K wildlife clips, but I might sometimes need to do batch processing if I get freelance work. Thanks, I have no clue about graphic card specs, so the feedback is really helpful. Hopefully, someone who has experience with newer graphics cards can make a suggestion that's actually helpful my comment above probably isn't. This desktop has an obsolescent GTX 1080Ti, which is only marginally adequate for some 4K gaming but fine for photographic purposes I'm hoping it doesn't die any time soon, as there's still a severe shortage of high-end graphics cards. If you're batching multiple images together, especially if you're using the excellent DeepPRIME noise reduction, you may want more graphics power to speed things up. Even my older laptop with integrated graphics runs PhotoLab 4 adequately with the single images I usually work with. Would I need to budget for a better graphic card or is it good enough to handle DXO and similar softwares? My laptop has an issue I haven't been able to sort out, so I'm considering getting a desktop model with a gen 11th i5 processor and an intel® UHD 730 Graphic card.
0 kommentar(er)
